Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Quest for colours: what's basic then?

From:Joe <joe@...>
Date:Thursday, April 22, 2004, 6:35
Adam Walker wrote:

>--- Levi Tooker <lrtooker@...> wrote: > > >>From what I remember, the criteria for the studies >>done on color universals >>excluded as basic color terms all loan words >>("beige", "magenta"), >> >> > >This is what I remember from a semantics class. Which >would, of course, exclude orange and purple too. >Orange is ultimately from Persian and purple is from >Greek. > > >
I don't believe that. It menas that, historically, it wasn't a basic colour term, but it is now.
>>morphologically complex words ("burnt umber", >>"off-white"), and words which >>are obviously derived from other lexical items >>("gold", "violet"...although >>"orange" seems to have been counted as a basic color >>term). >> >> > >Which, would exclude the German türqis and the English >aqua both of which are also borrowed. > > >
Well, I consider those 'green', but still.

Reply

Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>