Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: YAC: or more exactly: yet another conlang sketch

From:Robert Hailman <robert@...>
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 21:43
daniel andreasson wrote:
> > Robert Hailman wrote: > > > { j } is the palatal consonant is Ajuk, and I do use { -ij } to > > represent /i/ at the end of the root forms of words. This is because, in > > Ajuk, root forms can't end in vowels other than /i/, and to be > > orthographically consistent, no root forms can end it vowels, so I use { > > -ij }. It's just as well, as it does turn out /ij/ when another vowel > > follows. > > Yes, I remembered that there was (at least) one other conlang > that did this, just couldn't recall which one. Ajuk, I'll have > to remember that.
I'm organizing my thoughts on a website for Ajuk, I hope to have it up (relatively) soon. For loan words that end in vowels other than /i/, Ajuk adds /r/ to them, for example, "Cuba" becomes "Kubar", /kuba:r/. Apparently some people do things like this in certain English dialects (like JFK, he said /kju:b@r/ in certain circumstances), but I wasn't aware of that when I made that rule in Ajuk.
> I like the -ij of Dutch too, though with a different pronunciation > then, right Mrs. Rempt-Drijfhout? :)
How is it pronounced in Dutch, I know it exists, and that at one type it was treated as a single letter (maybe it still is), but I never knew it's pronounciation.
> I want to have more diphthongs in Rinya! But I don't want to > change the phonology again! Oh well. Back to the drawing table...
Yes, changing the phonology is something I don't like to do, and as a result Ajuk has relatively few diphthongs, my conlangs seem to love them.
> rinya > rinya > rijnya > rijnya > rinya > rijnya > rijnja > rinya > rinja > rijnja > rijna > > rijna røjna rouna ryjna > > So many possibilities!
But that's always the problem with conlanging, isn't it? Not a lack of possibilities, but an overwhelming abundance of them.
> If I decide on { rijna } then it could be pronounced either [rijna] > or [rejna] depending on dialect. Hmm...
You may be on to something there. A dialectical change of [ij] to [ej] could be interesting. Why don't you try it out with sample setances and see how it goes? It's really up to you, though... -- Robert