Re: "Usefull languages"
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 25, 2002, 0:17 |
Padraic Brown scripsit:
> Of course we don't have such an Article. It's not really
> necessary, on account of other statements in the C, the
> Right to Persuit of Happiness, especially.
Say what? That is the Declaration of Independence, which is
a political document, and not legal at all.
Anyway, our anti-discrimination clause is in the 14th
Amendment:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor
shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
> It's just a matter of where you want to put it. If Holland wants
> it all from the constitutional level, then that's what they'll
> do. We prefer all that from the local and national levels.
Remember that the U.S. *has* an autonomous local level, unlike most
nations. State constitutions have a lot more details than the
federal constitution does (and are changed a lot more often, too).
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
--_The Hobbit_