Re: pi

<<
It's perhaps not the same site, but I once found a site that claimed
to do
that, but was complete bogus. It didn't even get the sequence "1415"
right.
Evidently it mangled the numbers you typed in according to some
algorithm,
since it consistently gave the same outdata to the same indata.

                                                  Andreas
>>
I make absolutely no claims to its actual accuracy, but this was the
site I referred to: http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery

It seems to have got 1415 right, though...

The string 1415 was found at position 1 counting from the first digit
after the decimal point. The 3. is not counted.

Imperative