Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Fun, was Re: First thoughts on Imperial

From:Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>
Date:Sunday, July 20, 2003, 2:56
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Herman Miller wrote:

> Lots of fun / *very fun > Not much fun / *not very fun
Both 'very fun' and 'not very fun' are acceptible to me ('not very fun' more than 'very fun', I think). But then, the most common meaning of 'fun' in my speech is boring; annoying; hated; not fun: -'I have a Maths exam' -'Fun'. (No, it's not sarcasm, it's taking sarcasm to such an extent that the word changes meaning.) Unless it's negated, in which case it has the positive meaning again.
> *Lots of enjoyable / very enjoyable > *Not much enjoyable / not very enjoyable > > Great fun / *great enjoyable
But nevertheless, I stand corrected. Thankyou (and John) for pointing these out. -- Tristan <kesuari@...> Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement. -- Snoopy