Re: Previous post, more examples..
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 6, 2002, 18:21 |
JS Bangs scripsit:
> This is a good point. In fact, I'd be really curious to see if a lang
> could be designed to both have taxonomic/descriptive vocabulary and
> necessary redundancy. An interesting project . . .
Sure it could. The theory of error-detecting and -correcting codes is
well understood. Lojban uses this in a small way in its gismu (primitive
content words): no two of them differ only in the final vowel, nor do
the consonant parts differ solely in a single phonological feature.
For example, since "gismu" is the language, "gisma" is ruled out, and
so is "gisnu".
But adding error-detection (still less error-correction) to a Ro-type
language would make the long words even longer.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing
on my shoulders."
--Hal Abelson