Re: Previous post, more examples..
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 6, 2002, 17:42 |
Clint Jackson Baker writes:
> --- Abrigon Gusiq <abrigon@...> wrote:
> > cow = anizhazutuv (animal, herbivour,
> > land, large,
> > domesticated)
> >
> > But want to be able to describe what it is, but with
> > smaller words..
> >
> > Some form of defining that you can easily tell what
> > the word means cause
> > you know where the letters go, and each slot of the
> > word has a
> > sub-meaning.
> >
> > nihutuv=animal, herbivour, land, small. (I know I
> > need more work but ).
> >
> > Humans might be.
> >
> > Nomatum = animal (sentient), omnivourse, land,
> > medium.
> > Might add a way to the creatures motive means..
> >
> > Mike
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
>
> There was a phillang (how's that for a coinage?) from
> the eighteenth century that worked like this--I came
> across it in the intro to an Esperanto dictionary, but
> I can't remember the name of the lang. Does anyone
> else know?
>
> Clint
>
Ro. At least, Ro _is_ like this. There may have been others. I'm
sure I've heard references to them, and I got the idea they were
earlier. There's such a language mentioned in Pinker's _Words and
Rules_, but I'm not sure if that's Ro or not. I believe _The Search
for the Perfect Language_, by Eco, covers this kind of thing, but I
haven't read it.
http://www.invisiblelighthouse.com/langlab/ro.html
This kind of word generation is generally not seen as a good idea
these days. It does have some advantages - if you only need to know
the general category of a word, it doesn't matter if you miss part of
it, and it'd be helpful when hearing a new word in speech because
you'd know at least some of its characteristics. But there's a lack
of redundancy. If any element gets garbled, it's guaranteed to mean
something else (it might be nonsensical, but a lot of times it won't
be). Also, just imagine if you were, say, a greengrocer. Everything
you sold would have almost the same word, and you'd be likely to make
a lot of mistakes.