Re: Many consonants
| From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, November 8, 2001, 12:35 |
|---|
From: "David Peterson" <DigitalScream@...>
> In a message dated 11/7/01 4:55:39 PM, alrivera@ALUMNI.SOUTHERN.EDU writes:
>
> << Isn't the glottal/creaky voice IPA-symbolized by a tilde below the
> character in question? (in X-SAMPA it's /_k/ IIRC) >>
>
> There's a difference between glottalized consonants and creaky voice.
> Creaky voice is a tilda below whatever sonorant--you can have a
> creaky-voiced, glottalized [z], if you wanted. Glottalized is represented
> either by a putting a glottal stop before the glottalized segment (so that
> "hit" in English would be [hI?t]), or as a super-script--I've seen both.
Hum, I'm not aware of a definition of "sonorant" that includes [z]...
The IPA-help program lists [b_k] and [a_k] as examples of the creaky-voice
diacritic, if that means anything...
Also a search for "glottalized" finds this definition:
http://www.xrefer.com/entry/571590
"Produced with a secondary articulation of the
vocal cords: cf. glottal reinforcement. Also
in the same sense as ejective.
A *glottalized tone* is one realized by creaky voice."
I don't know what stød sounds like, but I have in several places heard it
described as "creaky voice".
*Muke!
Reply