Re: Tiny lexicon languages

Nik Taylor wrote:
>
> John Cowan wrote:
> > But if for * we read +,
> > then the usual convention is "five plus seven all over three"
> > vs. "five plus seven over three"
>
> Yeah, but when you get into more complex equations it can be nearly
> impossible to describe it in words, such as X+(Y*Z)/(A+B), and that's
> not even that complex.
Why not "open" and "close" for "(" and ")" ??
I haven't been in a math class for some years.