Whee! A reply! I was afraid the thread would sink into oblivion
without ever being answered...
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@E...> wrote:
> Does the feedback *have* to be sensible? Anyways ...
> On the HTML: the link for 2.2. is wrong, maybe missing a # ?
It seems so. I'll fix that when I get home.
> Also I
had to
> scroll horizontally to read most of the fixed-size tables. I don't
think
> they really need to be that wide. Otherwise ...
I just wanted to make the columns equally wide. There used to be
such a checkbox in Netscape Composer, but I can't find it in my
current version. Anyway, I'll switch to Safari as quickly as possible...
> The phonology looks reasonable (even if I would have done a couple
things
> differently -- no matter).
Do tell!
> My question is: how do you manage to make the descriptions so
simple?
I'm glad if they appear so, they are intended to be understandable.
I was afraid the stuffy tables would be a throw-off.
Thanks for the feedback.
-- Christian Thalmann
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!