>Hello everyone!
>
>I have finally found the inspiration for a new conlang. Currently,
>all I have in written form is a pretty comprehensive sketch of the
>*non-trivial* phonology. =)
>
>Right now, this is all I have:
>
>
http://catharsis.netpeople.ch/langmaking/orompaa.html
>
>Comments? Suggestions? Any kind of sensible feedback is
>appreciated.
>
>I'm looking for comments on the intellegibility of the matter
>and the used notation in particular.
>
>-- Christian Thalmann
Does the feedback *have* to be sensible? Anyways ...
On the HTML: the link for 2.2. is wrong, maybe missing a # ? Also I had to
scroll horizontally to read most of the fixed-size tables. I don't think
they really need to be that wide. Otherwise ...
The phonology looks reasonable (even if I would have done a couple things
differently -- no matter).
My question is: how do you manage to make the descriptions so simple?
Jeff