Re: Personality Type / Myers Briggs (was: Philotype)

Adam Walker wrote:

> Everyone's a *little* of both, but the question is -- which
> one applies to you *most* of the time in *most* situations.
> Which ids the "natural you" and which is the one you have to
> work at/develop.  If you really are a split on everything or
> most everything, most psychologists would say you are undeveloped
> psychologically, that you've never discovered who *you* are
> rather than who everyone around you is telling you you *should*
> be.  Then again you could be the perfectly balecnced person who
> is the next step in cosmic evolution.  Welcome to the list Buddha.
OK. So once again, this either/or split shows its ugly head,
not surprisingly. Either I'm undeveloped or I'm Buddha. How
ironic. Thanks, Adam... :-P

||| daniel