Re: [romconlang] Grand Master Plan of L3

BP,

This is the good thing about sharing ideas on this forum and thanks for your
response.

In this case the phonetic factor is the fudge rule: If you don't know it,
fudge it which is definitely artlang. However, I wish this conlang to be
much more true to developmental rules as much as I can. Up to this point
there is dZ in the language (and no tS for that matter).

The suggestion:
|       J, G, GY > /(d)Z/
|       DY > /dz/
Seems to fit closest in my mind, specifically using J,G,GY>Z. I can see
DY>dz as well. Would it be unreasonable to see all four simply go to Z?


>Given c > z / V_{e,i} I'd expect J, G > [j] / V_V
Makes sense.

>And do you mean only g / _{e,i} or would g / _{o,u} palatalize?
Only g/_{e,i} would palatalize.

Scotto

Reply