Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: [romconlang] Grand Master Plan of L3

From:Benct Philip Jonsson <melroch@...>
Date:Saturday, January 26, 2008, 17:07
2008/1/26, Scotto Hlad <scott.hlad@...>:
> BP, > > This is the good thing about sharing ideas on this forum and thanks for your > response. > > In this case the phonetic factor is the fudge rule: If you don't know it, > fudge it which is definitely artlang.
Sorry! Can't help be a sucker for realism...
> However, I wish this conlang to be > much more true to developmental rules as much as I can. Up to this point > there is dZ in the language (and no tS for that matter).
I take it you mean there are neither dZ nor tS? Fine with me, since they're nasty to pronounce, but so's Z in my Swedish opinion...
> > The suggestion: > | J, G, GY > /(d)Z/ > | DY > /dz/ > Seems to fit closest in my mind, specifically using J,G,GY>Z. I can see > DY>dz as well. Would it be unreasonable to see all four simply go to Z?
No, after all DIURNUS > jour /ZuR/ in French!
> >Given c > z / V_{e,i} I'd expect J, G > [j] / V_V > > Makes sense. > > >And do you mean only g / _{e,i} or would g / _{o,u} palatalize? > > Only g/_{e,i} would palatalize. > > Scotto >
-- / BP