Re: USAGE: Garden paths
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 21:22 |
J Matthew Pearson wrote:
> Furthermore, it's not just any old transitive/intransitive verbs which you don't like in
> reduced relatives--it's specifically those which lack a separate morphological form for
> the past participle.
I'm not so sure, "The horse raced by the jockey past the barn fell down"
is an odd, but still acceptable, sentence to me - once again, there's a
"by" phrase. *"The poll conducted was inconclusive" is unacceptable,
and it lacks a "by" phrase. "The horse ridden past the barn fell down"
is almost as unacceptable (at least in as much as I would never produce
it) as with "raced", and that HAS a separate participial form, so it
can't be morphology at work.
> Why build extra rules
> into the grammar, when the effects of those rules are entirely duplicated by limitations
> of the parser?
Okay, I see your point. I buy that distinction.
--
"Their bodies did not age, but they became afeared of everything and
anything. For partaking in any activity at all could threaten their
precious and ageless bodies! ... Their victory over death was a hollow
one."
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor