Re: Alternation of Airstream
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 20, 2005, 18:26 |
David J. Peterson wrote at 2005-10-20 11:07:58 (-0700)
> Veritos (?) wrote:
> <<
> Yet another of my odd ideas (the previous was the sign-language as
> vocal language concept). I was thinking of having an alternating
> airstream, so you speak as you both exhale _and_ inhale. In this way,
> you could breathe without pausing. Sure, it sounds weird (eigh
> mhhhidd yee-elp = I need help), but would it be the slightest bit
> feasible?
> >>
>
> According to Jack Black, yes. This is called using ingressive air,
> and it certainly can be done (go ahead, try it), but no language
> uses it productively (that is, for the whole utterance, rather than
> just implosives).
The point is less that it isn't used for a whole utterance, than that
no language has ingressive _pulmonic_ phonemes. That is, initiated by
inhalation into the lungs. Implosives and clicks are ingressive
sounds, but the initiation is glottal or velar respectively.
Replies