Re: Tentative Ebisedian number system
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, July 4, 2002, 18:54 |
H. S. Teoh scripsit:
> But getting back to my original point---the type of number-modification I
> was referring to is by compounding: you stick the radix of the noun onto
> the word for the number. So you'd get compounds like "the horsey
> threeness", i.e., the threeness peculiar to the horses, for "three
> horses"; or the "housey twenty-seven-ness", the twenty-seven-ness that is
> very houselike, referring to the fact that this particular instance of
> being twenty-seven is the twenty-seven of those twenty-seven houses.
I think it's misleading to write (and think) "threeness", "twenty-sevenness".
Rather it should be "threesome", "twenty-sevensome". English has words
like duo/pair, trio, quartet, quintet for the first few members of this
series, although vigintiseptet is probably too far out. Nevertheless,
this clearly names a *collection* rather than an *abstraction*, which is
what you want here. Threeness would be the *property* or *quality*
of being three, rather than a concrete collection of size 3.
ObRant: I blenched yesterday to read of three women as a
"triumvirate"!
--
John Cowan <jcowan@...> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
Reply