Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Classification of Abstract Words

From:Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Date:Monday, January 29, 2007, 10:33
Hi!

Leon Lin writes:
> I am trying to make a philosophical language and I am having trouble with > abstract words like "justice", "love", or "communication". Perhaps I have > not studied them hard enough, but I can't quite find equivalents in > languages like Latejami or Ithkuil.
What exactly is your problem with them? My Qþyn|gài also does not (yet) have them in the lexicon, but I see no problem. Here's how the words would be derived. The lexicon entries of my engelang are built from category consonants, of which there are 40. From these categories, roots are derived by adding another consonant (and optionally another syllable). From the roots, stems of lexicon entries are derived by adding a vowel. First, we need to select the basic concept, which in Qþyn|gài must be a state or entity (the two are handled alike). Let's take 'love': I'd use the category consonant for 'sentient' and derive (in two stems, using or not using the root 'liking', which exists already) a stem 'love' from it. If you want to express the abstract concept, you'd compound this with the stem that makes abstract nouns (e.g. -ity or sometimes -tion in English). With 'justice' (from category 'value') and 'communication' (from category 'communication'), I'd do pretty much the same, actually. **Henrik

Reply

Leon Lin <leon_math@...>