Re: Weekly Vocab 31
| From: | paul-bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, December 11, 2003, 14:42 |
|---|
>On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 13:48:15 -0800 Jonathan Lipps <jon832@...>
wrote.
><snip>weekly vocab</snip>
>
>Forgive my ignorance, but is the weekly vocab supposed to be a tool just
for
>ourselves, or is it customary, once we make or look up the words in our
>conlang, to post the results to the list?
's far as I know, it's strictly optional.
I intend to track down the entire archive of them (@ Muke, right?) and
derive Thagojian vocab just as soon as I can find a satisfactory
sound-change program, and as soon as I can nail down the huge gender/case
matrix, and a few other grammatical morpheme and morph sets. Work has been
slower than it ought to be. Thusfar, I have less than a dozen vocab items,
and probably about that many entries in the GCM. It is non-satisfactory.
Paul