From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 3:32 |
Questions about the second and third clauses Dirk Elzinga wrote at 2004-01-21 08:31:15 (-0700) > > 2. [?i's1a 'ka:sup\"t1Ga"t1Ga "?as1'w1G1N"gi:] > isea kaasuptekateka asewekenki > > n- sea kaasu -pte -ka -teka a= se- <Vk> wenki > TR- out.of remove:U -EYE -UN -RED:DIST DS= 3poss <COLL> eye > > They were taking out their eyes > > 3. [ju'nanai 'w1pp1p\"t1Ga"t1Gahu ?i '?auGai] > yunanai weppeptekatekahu i aukai > > yu= n- anai weppe -pte -ka -teka -hu i a= ukai > and= TR- upwards throw:U -EYE -UN -RED:DIST -away.from OBL DS= sky > > and throwing them up into the air > > This clause provides a good example of the structures possible in > complex predicates. The first element of a complex predicate hosts > the proclitic string (here represented by _yu=_ 'and') and is > inflected for transitivity. The final element of a complex > predicate shows phase and number marking and bears lexical and > directional suffixes. I'm not sure that I understand transitivity in Miapimoquitch. What's the relation of _kaasuptekateka_ to _isea_, to begin with?
Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> |