Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Evidence for Nostratic? (was Re: Proto-Uralic?)

From:Ian Spackman <ianspackman@...>
Date:Thursday, July 10, 2003, 18:56
At 16:32 10/07/03, you wrote:

> > > >It's not 100% clear that dent- originally meant "tooth". Its formal > > > >English equivalent "tine" (< ME "tind", as in JRRT's "Tindrock") means > > > >"sharp projection", as on a fork, and has no connection with eating. > > > > > > For what is worth, in French such a thing is called "dent", meaning > > > definitely "tooth", which for me is no different from talking about the > > > "foot" of a mountain. > > > > Swedish forks have _tänder_, which word normally means "teeth". > >I assume that's cognate with 'teeth', though. Remember English, Low German, >Dutch and Frisian all lost proto-Germanic *n before Fricatives. And I think >in Norwegian, Swedish and Danish there was a *þ>d shift.
Indeed. The English cognate is tooth, not tine, surely, with just this loss of n! Ian