Re: S7 grammar in a nutshell (long)
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 13:10 |
From: Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
> And Rosta <a.rosta@...> writes:
> > What is the max number of arguments a predicate can have?
>
> Two: agent and patient.
You mean you have no ditransitive verbs in your language at all?
That seems rather rare in my experience. There are plenty of languages
that seek to *create* more ditransitives (applicatives, e.g.).
> > Clitics. I'm not sure what functional virtue these have.
>
> It's probably a misnomer. I wanted a distinction between affixes,
> which are non directly derived from stems, but a distinct, closed
> lexical class, and stripped stems -- stems without their class prefix.
> I called the latter 'clitics', because there cannot be used in
> isolation, but since that is not the only criterion for clitics, the
> name is probably misleading.
>
> Do you have a good name for it? 'Stripped stem that cannot be used in
> isolation' in one word.
What you're describing sounds something like the distinction between
"stem" and "root" in certain areal studies.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637
Reply