Re: A few questions about linguistics concerning my new project
From: | David J. Peterson <dedalvs@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 19:59 |
Nick:
<<
Actually, I did read that/your article on ergativity. I do understand
how
the antipassive works (and that it can apply in certain situations)
but, I
cannot yet grasp why you would need an antipassive in an ergative-
aligned
language to describe a 'passive' situation. Is it not possible to have a
passive by just marking it on the verb and using oblique like this:
/panda-OBL. pet-PASS./ ?
>>
I never suggested that you'd use an antipassive to describe a
passive situation. You use an antipassive to describe an antipassive
situation. But here's a question: why you need to describe a
passive situation in an ergative-aligned language? It seems that
there would either be no need, or that the morphology as it is
would provide you with a way of doing so without resorting to
any special construction.
-David
*******************************************************************
"sunly eleSkarez ygralleryf ydZZixelje je ox2mejze."
"No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn."
-Jim Morrison
http://dedalvs.free.fr/