Re: affection regression progression ???

Aidan Grey wrote:


>    Is affection more likely to be regressive or progressive? Will the same
> lang show both, or show primarily one of them? I'm trying to determine
> sound laws, and this bit has me stumped.
In theory it could work both ways--
underlying o..i > ö..i (regressive, as in Germanic)
underlying o..i > o..y (progressive, Turkish?)

There can also be a raising/lowering affect--
underlying i...a > e...a   or  i...e
underlying u..a > o...a  or o...a
Both are seen (with some irregularity) in Polynesian historical phonology.

IIRC Tonga  kula 'to blush', but kulokula 'red'

(in my favorite group of Indonesian langs.)
AN *sukat 'to measure' > Proto **su?at >
No affect in Leti suat-,
Regressive in Moa soat-,
then progressive in Kisar hook-

I imagine there could be consonant-affects too, e.g. an initial nasal could
cause all succeeding stops to > nasal, or prenasalized?? This happens to a
small extent in some Indo. languages (either historically, synchronically or
both!) e.g. *mayang 'coconut blossom' > Ngaju Dayak mañang; the various
nasal prefixes also affect internal /y/ the same way, but I can't find my
dictionary at the mo.

Reply