Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

From:Jake X <alwaysawake247@...>
Date:Monday, May 27, 2002, 15:51
In those cases, I'd strike the compound tense completely, and just say "The
family argued..." etc. That would save ambiguity and confusion.

~Patient is the procrastinator.~

>From: Kendra <kendra@...> >Reply-To: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...> >To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU >Subject: Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: >Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 12:34:53 -0700 > > > Nik: > > > I can't speak for John, but for me "the team are" is as ungrammatical >as > > > "the man are" > > And Tom Wier & John Cowan, like good North Americans, concur. > > Are any of the following okay? > > 1a. My family were arguing with each other. > > 1b. My family was arguing with each other. > > > > 2a. My family were behaving themselves. > > 2b. My family was behaving themselves. > > 2c. My family was behaving itself. > >Personally, I would use none of those. >I'd strike out "were arguing," "were behaving," and "was behaving itself" >right off. I don't know if "My family was arguing with eachother" is >incorrect, but it doesn't sound right to me. I'd rather say something like >"Everyone in my family was arguing," "my family was arguing," "the whole >family was arguing," "everyone in the family was behaving themself," etc. > >-Kendra >http://www.refrigeratedcake.com >http://www.refrigeratedcake.com/other/theatre -- Vade Mecum (comic) >----- Original Message ----- >From: "And Rosta" <a-rosta@...> >To: <CONLANG@...> >Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:52 AM >Subject: Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: > > > >
_________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com