Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: II Silindion Returns! (Longish)

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Thursday, March 13, 2003, 13:48
En réponse à Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>:

> > Proto-Nestean Consonant Inventory > Regular: Aspirate: Palatal: Labial: > t d th dh tj dj tw dw > p b ph bh pj bj pw bw > k g kh gh kj gj kw gw > > Glottal: Pre-Nasal: Fricative: Lateral: > t? nt nd s l > p? mp mb S (<shut>) lj > k? Nk Ng l? > > Nasal: Semi-Vowel: > n j > nj w > m > N > > Question 1: can one have voiced glottalized > obstruents? >
Difficult. Maybe as voiced consonant+glottal stop clusters?
> ------------------------ > Western Developments: > Initial Final (Medial): > Regular > t d t D d D > p b p B b B > k g k G g G >
Why the (Medial) in parentheses? Also, I find the change of final voiceless stops into final voiced stops quite strange. In general, final stops tend to be *devoiced* rather than voiced. I'd rather expect something like : voiceless stops stay voiceless, except medially where they are voiced, and voiced stops stay voiced in initial position (or become fricatives), become fricatives in medial position and stay as they are or are devoiced in final position.
> (the voiced obstruents become fricativized) > > Asipirate: > th dh th dh t dh > ph bh ph bh p bh > kh gh kh h k h >
I'd expect all the voiced aspirates to become fricatives like gh did, maybe with devoicing, which would mean dh > T and bh > p\. That would introduce voiceless equivalents to some of the voiced fricatives you showed above and would put more balance in the system.
> Palatal: > tj dj tj dj tj d > pj bj tj bj tj b > kj gj tj Nj tj g >
OK, I agree on that.
> Labial: > tw dw pw nw dw nw > pw bw pw w bw w > kw gw kw w gw w >
Not sure about those...
> Glottal: > t? d d > p? b b > k? g g >
Agreed.
> Pre-Nasal: > nt nd t nd n n > mp mb p b m m > Nk Ng Nk Ng Nk Ng >
Not sure about it here. You prenasals seem to behave a bit independently from each other, which is quite unlikely. As I already said, sound changes prefer to apply to groups of sounds rather than differently to each sound. Also, in final position I'd expect Ng and Nk to become N if all the others lose the stop too.
> > Initially: Finally: > d > l (or d) d
When does it become l and when does it stay d?
> b > b b > g > g g > > Everywhere: > dh > d > bh > bh > h > - >
I doubt such a rare type as a voiced aspirate would stay only for *one* consonant. Voiced aspirates are rare, and no system is known to have voiced aspirates without the voiceless ones (PIE is an exception but since it's a reconstruction it doesn't count as we don't know if the reconstructed voiced aspirates were indeed voiced aspirates or something else), and even less to have a single voiced aspirate. If you have dh > d, automatically you'd have bh
> b
> tj > tj initially > tj > s finally >
I guess it would do that through a chain tj > tS > ts > s...
> > Question 2: How does one right voiceless _r_ in Sampa? >
[r_0].
> > That's the end of the major developments, comments > appreciated. >
Well, you have mine :)) . I have mostly the same critique as I had with the evolution of the vowel system: each sound is much too independent from the others. Sounds normally evolve in groups, and separate from a group they belong to only because they are felt to belong to another group and follow this new group along. You should try to work sound changes as changes in *features* (you know, the representation [+voiced] [-continuant] etc...) applying to sounds showing some features rather than as changes of individual sounds. It would give more plausibility to your reconstructions and sound changes. Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr It takes a straight mind to create a twisted conlang.

Reply

Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>