Re: RFC: New CXS symbol needed.

Paul Bennett, On 03/11/2005 18:58:

> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:01:35 -0500, Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>  wrote:
>
>> Tristan Mc Leay skrev:
>
>
>>>   I propose we wait until X-Sampa has a representation for it.
>
>
>> I agree.
>
>
> Why? What has X-SAMPA got to do with the future of CXS? True enough, it was the
> primary source of CXS symbols, but we made improvements. X-SAMPA contained
> bad ideas, which CXS put right. Should we automatically adopt X-SAMPA's idea
> for this symbol, regardless of whether it's good or not? That seems
> antithetical.

I agree with Paul. CXS is rather good, & X-Sampa is a bag of shite.

--And.