Simon Clarkstone wrote:
>On 7/24/05, # 1 <salut_vous_autre@...> wrote:
> > Last night, I tought of a new conlang.
>[snip]
> > The consonants are:
>[snip]
> > L\_o_r = khh (unvoiced lateral velar fricative)
>Isn't /_r_o/ (raised+lowered) a contradiction? I assume you mean
>/_r_0/ (raised+voiceless) which is kinda supported by all "/_o/"
>phonemes having latin letters corresponding to unvoiced european
>consonants.
Ho you're right! that's what I meant.
> > B\_o = c (billabial flap)
>[snip]
> > R\_o = x (uvular flap)
>... and these two would now make more sense; you can't pronounce a lowered
>flap.
>
>[snip]
> > Comments? Remarks?
>Apart from the (AFAICT) CXS confusion, it looks nice and odd.
>
>src/
Thanks for correcting my mistakes
- Max