Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: New Conlang

From:Paul Roser <pkroser@...>
Date:Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 19:28
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:00:16 +0300, John Vertical <johnvertical@...>
wrote:

>>Taps/flaps are ballistic movements and by definition can only have one >>contact. Trills, on the other hand, are caused by the Bernouilli effect, >>so strictly speaking a trill is not the same thing as multiple taps or >>a "prolonged" or geminate tap. > >"Ballistic" movements?
A term I've come across in the literature - best definition I could find online: "relating to or characteristic of the motion of objects moving under their own momentum and the force of gravity" -- which pretty much describes the articulation of a tap/flap.
>And you really mean it would be possible to differentiate not just >taps/percussives vs. flaps, but also single-contact trills?? I'm unable >to produce this last distinction.
Articulatorily it would be possible to distinguish taps/flaps fromsingle- contact trills, though I doubt the listener would be able to hear any discernable difference between an alveolar tap and a single-contact alveolar trill. The term percussive is now reserved for a small set of phones, mostly found in disordered speech, though the sublingual percussive occurs in some productions of the alveolar click (actually realized in this case as a double click - after the tongue tip releases from contact with the alveolar ridge the underside of the tongue makes contact with the floor of the mouth).
>Furthermore, what's the common category for all these sounds?
There's a lot of disagreement on what to call them - 'rhotic' covers most of them, but excludes the bilabial trill and may or may not exclude the uvular trill. A *very* old term that I thought nicely covered taps, flaps & trills was 'vibrant', but it doesn't seem to be used much in the literature now.
>Here's a rather weird idea: how about denoting numeral n by a trill with n >contacts? Another trill phoneme could be used for reciprocals, and maybe >even a third for square roots ... :D
Weird indeed, but interesting, though I doubt humans would have the aural acuity to distinguish numbers by the number of contacts in trills, but that doesn't mean it couldn't work in a non-human language. Bfowol