Re: USAGE: Fänyläjikyl Inglyx

Somewhat... as I said, if any spelling system of the sort were to be
made official.  The spelling would have to be derived from the national
dictionary.  Yes, English would become more regularized than it is now.
Regional dialects would either slowly vanish or adopt non-official
spellings of their own.

Let me explain my phonlogical english title:

Founylorjykyl Englix
F=E4nyl=E4jikyl Inglyx
(fawn-aw-law-gee-cal een-gleesh)

=E4 stands for a as in awe.
y stands for schwa
j as in james
i as in in/ill/instant/illicit
x as in sh

Does Your version still disagree with mine?

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Bennett <Paul.Bennett@...>
To: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: F=E4nyl=E4jikyl Inglyx


>>>>>>
F=E4nyl=E4jikyl Inglyx [Phonological English]
<<<<<<

There's only one problem with "close" or "tight" phonological description=
s,
which is that they rely on two speakers having the same accent.

Based on your example, I'd think that I'd have to write:
Founylorjykyl Englix