Re: Was Tolkien a good conlanger? (was: Re: Good Books)
From: | David Peterson <thatbluecat@...> |
Date: | Saturday, March 6, 2004, 1:32 |
Shoot! I shouldn't keep this going, but And wrote:
<<He was working at a time when -- at
least until the last decade of his life -- he would have presumed
(wrongly) that nobody would be interested in his languages and
(rightly) that many would condemn him for wasting his time on
such a frivolous and contemptible pastime instead of doing the
research a professor ought to be doing. That excuses the
incompleteness of the languages, especially the gross inadequacy
of their documentation.>>
You know what? This is a really, really, really good point that I never
even considered. So, kudos to you, and I'll remember this every time I look at
Tolkien's languages in the future.
-David