Re: CHAT: Glottalized consonants
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Saturday, May 15, 1999, 16:34 |
Danny Wier wrote:
> The Neogrammarian system is a clear violation of linguistic universals, but
> of course Greenberg came after the Neogrammarians. A voiced stop implies a
> voiceless counterpart, so there would have to either be a four-way
> distinction as in Sanskrit and daughter languages (t-th-d-dh), or the
> three-way with ejective of Armenian (t-t'-d).
Well, to be fair, there was originally a reconstructed fourway contrast
between t-th-d-dh, but th was later abandoned. It's been argued that
the voiced aspirate is a holdover from the day when Sanskrit had an
undue influence on reconstructed PIE.
--
"It's bad manners to talk about ropes in the house of a man whose father
was hanged." - Irish proverb
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-name: NikTailor