Re: Senyecan nouns (for Doug Dee)
From: | caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 2:12 |
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Doug Dee <AmateurLinguist@A...> wrote:
>Another gender-related question: how do you deal with mixed groups,
>like "The woman and the centaur are (both) angry"? Which form
>of "angry" would be used, given that "woman" and "centaur" are in
>different classes?
Rule 184 in the Senyecan grammar: A predicate adjective when
qualifying more than one substantive, agrees in gender, number, and
case with the nearest substantive.
sun göénun søn µiréöøncöe méløn nésa.
the woman the centaur-and angry they-are.
Rule 183 is similar: An attributive adjective qualifying several
nouns agrees with the nearest and is understood with the rest.
sen ðévaÞen éöen réðuncöe nufóóla.
the injured horse rider-and they-fall.
What I find interesting is the use of the personal pronoun prefix on
the verb. In these examples the subjects have been loquent beings in
the u-class.
If the subject is of another class, the appropiate personal pronoun
prefix must be used.
søn µiréöøn nøfóóla. sin aabélin nifóóla.
the centaur he-falls. the appletree it-falls.
This was not evident in the example above because the verb began with
a vowel. In this case, the vowel of the personal pronoun prefix is
not used.
nu-fóól-a, but n-és-a.
he-fall-IND he-is-IND
Thanks for the question. You're keeping me on my toes. And at 63,
that's not always easy!!
Charlie