Re: Conlang and like influences NATLANG
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 0:34 |
Lars Henrik Mathiesen wrote:
> There are border cases like Classical Latin, but if you want examples
> from a fully fledged conlang that didn't start out by pretending to be
> the prestige dialect of a natlang, I don't think there's going to be
> much besides your own example.
Well, if you count that, then Formal English (which is also
semi-artificial) has certainly influenced colloquial English as well.
Double negatives used to be a very common thing in English, until They
said it was wrong. Now, I don't never use no double negatives. ;-)
Actually, the only double negative I can think of in my idiolect is "no
X, no Y, no nothing" and, occasionally, "hardly" with a negative (at
least, that's traditionally CALLED a double negative, it doesn't seem
like it to me)
--
"Old linguists never die - they just come to voiceless stops." -
anonymous
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor