Re: USAGE: Language revival
From: | Grandsire, C.A. <grandsir@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 2, 1999, 7:57 |
Raymond Brown wrote:
>
> At 10:33 am -0300 30/11/99, FFlores wrote:
> >Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> wrote:
> [....]
> >> Incidentally, I read that "forehead" was once pronounced something like
> >> /forId/, with the h being re-introduced.
> >
> >That's how I was taught also! It seemed very strange to me at first,
> >until I got accustomed. Now you tell me it's wrong again? :)
>
> No, no - it's not wrong!
>
> For most of my life most people in England (where English BTW originated
> :) said /'fOrId/. The /h/ is a horrid innovation, that has become
> increasingly more common in the last 10 to 20 years, introduced by people
> who want to sound correct ;)
>
It must have spread in English teaching for non-native English
speakers, because I learned /fO:hEd/.
> Ray.
>
> =========================================
> A mind which thinks at its own expense
> will always interfere with language.
> [J.G. Hamann 1760]
> =========================================
--
Christophe Grandsire
Philips Research Laboratories -- Building WB 145
Prof. Holstlaan 4
5656 AA Eindhoven
The Netherlands
Phone: +31-40-27-45006
E-mail: grandsir@natlab.research.philips.com