Re: Anything else to declare?

Joe wrote:
> Roger Mills wrote:
>
>> Charlie wrote:
>> Ooh, had to do a difficult archive search to find this (from June 02,
>> in the
>> thread "Re: CHAT: The Fabulous Personalities of Conlang", which probably
>> started in May 02):
>>
>> INTP (67, 44, 33, 22 resp.)
>> enneagram 4 (9 was a strong second)
>>
>> I no longer remember what any of that means.....:-((
>>
>> IIRC, those who responded were pretty much all over the map.
>
> But introversion was normal.  And there are a significant number more Ns
> than in most.
Since this subthread seems to be populated entirely by INTPs, I'll declare
myself here: INTP. I've done various MBTI test semi-regularly over the years,
and I've always gotten the same result: INTP, with strong I.

Never tried the enneagram.

s.
--