Relative clauses in Orēlynna

Finally, a bit of progress on relative clauses in Orēlynna. The
description that follows describes some terms that I needed to
explicitly explain for my own good, so if I got the descriptions wrong,
please feel free to correct me.

A relative clause appears after its head noun.

Unlike English, which can use pronouns to serve as relativizers and to
reflect the role of the noun phrase in the clause (NPrel; such as 'who',
'which', etc.), Orēlynna uses a relativizer |go| that does not reflect
the NPrel’s role. Therefore, in some cases it is necessary to use a
pronoun to avoid ambiguity. Orēlynna uses the pronoun retention method
(see _Describing Morphosyntax_) to express the grammatical relation of
the NPrel, but only if the NP is NOT in agent/subject position. In the
agent position no pronoun is needed because Orēlynna is a pro-drop
language (subject info encoded in verb). The pronouns are the same in
relative clauses as in main clauses.

Examples:
single clause:
suno  anudo.
see.I man.ACC
'I see a man.'

relative clause with subject referent:
suno  anudo   go  suntida    ey.
see.I man.ACC REL see.3S-neg me.ACC
'I see a man that [he] cannot see me.' or more smoothly: 'I see a man
who cannot see me.'

relative clause with object referent:
suno  anudomy     go  ānda    anka      dua.
see.I man-the.ACC REL love.3S woman.NOM 3ph.ACC
'I see the man that the woman loves him.' or more smoothly: 'I see the
man whom the woman loves.'

Comments, corrections, questions, etc. welcome.
--
=============
James Worlton
          "We know by means of our intelligence
          that what the intelligence does not
          comprehend is more real than what it
          does comprehend."
                           --Simone Weil

Reply