Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: Ergativity and polypersonalism

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Monday, January 24, 2005, 15:56
Isaac wrote:
> Joerg wrote: > > Ah, Klimov's contentive typology! ... If you ask me, it's all rubbish. > > That is why I keep on asking forgiveness of my ignorance in typology studies, > even though I'm a professional philologist. For example, I heard about split-S > etc. only here at this List. Our linguistic education was still profiled by > Stalin's "Marxism and Linguistic Issues". Surely, since 1970s there were > some changes, but typology studies were still smth suspective, bourgeois... > That is why Klimov seemed revolutionary. I suspect Dr. Tyshchenko's lectures > on typology at General Linguistics classes in Kiev Uni in 1989 that I heard, > were quite in line with Klimov's stadial theory.
I would have to partially disagree with Joerg's strong opinion on Klimov. Yes, his stadialist theory is accepted by virtually no one nowadays, for good reason. But as a scholar, few have ever achieved his level of insight into cross-linguistic generalizations. It is not an accident that indisputably great typologists like Johanna Nichols still cite his work, even when disagreeing with some conclusions. His works focusing on the Caucasus are also of great value.
> I don't want to offend anybody, but some "Western" ideas in linguistics still > strike me as odd, if not rubbish... Not in this case, of course.
Well, it may please you to learn that "Western" ideas in linguistics strike some Westerners as odd, if not rubbish, too. I would disagree with Chris to some extent, though: Chomsky is not just quackery. His work on the properties of formal languages in the 1960s is widely recognized for the achievement it is far beyond the cult-following he has surrounded himself with. And his writings on the philosophy of language, too, rank with Wittgenstein and other 20th century greats. It's just mostly in the particulars of the various rescensions of his theories that true quackery lies. (See, e.g., Peter Seuren's new book _Chomsky's Minimalism_ for extended critical discussion of this.) ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637