Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: relative tense

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Tuesday, March 23, 1999, 7:55
At 07:38 23/03/99 +0000, you wrote:
>At 9:04 pm -0300 22/3/99, FFlores wrote: >>Boudewijn Rempt <brt@...> wrote: >...... >>> agreement systems. Does anyone know of a conlang that has object agreement >>> incorporated into the verb? >>> >> >>It depends on what you mean by incorporated. > >Presumably as an affix (either prefix, infix or suffix). > >I can't think off hand of any conlang that does this, but I'd be very >surprised if there were none. > >> >>As for natlangs, Basque does something like that too -- >>but I don't know to what extent. > >The Bantu languages regularly do this - it comes after the subject and >tense-sign prefixes and before the word stem. However, the object affix is >not required if the object is a noun but is used if it desired to emphasize >the noun. For example, in Swahili > >Nilikisoma = I read /rEd/ it (i.e. the book) <-- ni [I] + li[past] + ki [it] > >Umeleta kitabu? Have you brought a book? >Umekileta kitabu? Have you brought _the_ book [I wanted]? >
That makes me think of a language where noun-verb agreement would be used only to mark definiteness ("the"). I like this idea. Do any of you already did it ?
>Ray. > >
Christophe Grandsire |Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G. "Reality is just another point of view." homepage : http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepage/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html