Re: Order of cases
| From: | Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, October 3, 2004, 20:29 |
|---|
Hallo!
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:01:32 -0400,
Jeffrey Henning <jeffrey@...> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:42:36 +0200, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Rhiemeier
> <joerg_rhiemeier@...> wrote:
>
>
> >The normal order in which I list the cases of Old Albic is:
> >
> >1. Agentive
> >2. Genitive
> >3. Dative
> >4. Objective
> >5. Instrumental
> >6. Locative
> >7. Allative
> >8. Ablative
>
> Why no "Patientive"?
That's the objective case. I could indeed rename it "patientive",
and actually pondered such a renaming several times, but I have
become used to calling it "objective". It is also the term
Fillmore used for the "deep case" the Albic objective case represents.
Greetings,
Jörg.