Re: help! phonology...& addendum
From: | Irina Rempt <ira@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 24, 2000, 5:32 |
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, jesse stephen bangs wrote:
> I've heard this rule, too, but I just thought of an obvious exception in
> English. English has six dental/alveolar fricatives /T D s z S Z/ but
> only four sounds that could reasonably be called stops /t d tZ dZ/.
/tS/, surely?
> No
> matter how you slice it *some* set of fricative is gonna be orphaned,
> unless you make the silly assertion that /T D/ are the "same class" as /s
> z/.
They're in a class of their own; there are no dental stops in
English, even if that's what they told us /t d/ were called. Why
can't they teach the word "alveolar" to twelve-year-olds?
Dutch doesn't have /T D/, but it doesn't have the affricates /tS dZ/
either, except in loan-words (or /S/ /Z/, for that matter, but those
loan-words happen to be more frequent, mostly from French), so it's
the same problem only with different orphans.
Irina
--
Varsinen an laynynay, saraz no arlet rastynay.
irina@valdyas.org (myself) http://www.valdyas.org/irina/valdyas