Re: Linguochronology
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Sunday, August 17, 2003, 9:23 |
Quoting Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>:
> Quoting John Cowan <cowan@...>:
> > Even the most aggressive lumpers don't think that Eskimo-Aleut (which
> > still has relatives in Asia), Na-Dene (basically Haida, Tlingit, and
> > Athapaskan), and the remaining languages are related below the level
> > (if there is such a level) of Proto-World.
>
> By E-A having relatives in Asia, I assume you're not refering to Siberian
> Yupik (since that, as far as I understand, got there from Alaska). So what
> are those Asian relatives?
In addition to Central Siberian Yupik, there is also Mednij
Aleut (a mixed Russian-Aleut language, analogous to Michif),
a dialect of Aleut similar to Atkan Aleut, Naukan Yupik, and
one living speaker of Sirenik Yupik. It's an open question
whether some of these are autochthonous languages or not.
> BTW, how far west is Aleutian spoken? Russia's Komandorskije Ostrova (can't
> find English name)
Variously Komandor Islands or, more frequently, Commander Islands.
> is as close to Attu as to Kamchatka ...
I believe that the Commander and Bering Islands are about
as far west as they go. The Yupik laguages are spoken on
the Chukot peninsula, however.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637