two related languages

here are a few cognates in some related conlangs:

 a       b       c       d
pod     pat     fod     fat
bak     peg     veg     vek
pet     bit     pit     fid
bod     bad     bot     vad

the languages are labelled 'a', 'b', 'c', and 'd' because i haven't given
them names (or even assigned meanings to the words).  i am wondering how
difficult it would be to reconstruct the original language (an a priori
conlang).  i have the forms of these words in the original language, so
if anyone wants to try to reconstruct them, it would be interesting to
see how close they are to the actual words.

Robert Wilson
http://kuvazokad.free.fr/
Yessessë Eru ontanë Menel ar Cemen.
Yessessë ëa Quetta ar Quetta né as Eru ar Eru né Quetta.

Reply