beginner

Hello everyone! This is my first email on this list.
I'm from Brazil, so you must excuse my bad english.

<Is a kind of language easier to create in flexionnal,
agglutinative, and isolating? >

I think all those types of language have its own
problems. But in my case, I invented a agglutinative
language. I wasn't thinking wich one was the easiest.
I wanted to create something very different from the
portuguese, a flexional language. I don't really
prefer agglutinative ones, I just wanted a very
strange system. So, how I'm not used to agglutinative
languages...

One more thing. Michael Potter mentioned some "word
generator programs". Where can I found one?

Thank you

> # 1 wrote:
>
>> I've still never complete a conlang
>>
>> I would like to ask for advices.
>>
>> What kind of conlang should I try to create first?
>>
>> should I keep it simple with a little conjugaison,
vocabulary similar to my
>> mother tongue, avoid complicated or too different
concepts?
>>
>> should I first try to create something similar to
languages I speak?
>>
>> Is a kind of language easier to create in
flexionnal, agglutinative, and
>> isolating?
>>
>> It is simply because I don't want to continue to
create great ideas of
>> grammars and never make the rest of the conlang
around it
>>
>>
>> Help? advises?
>>
>
>
>


	
	
		
_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora.
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ - Internet rápida e grátis

Reply