Re: Llirine: introduction and phonology
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 2, 2001, 12:19 |
In a message dated 12/1/01 9:14:25 PM, starner@OKSTATE.EDU writes:
<< Hi. I'm new to this list, and to the actual pratice of conlanging. I'm a
student at Oklahoma State University, majoring in math and computer
science.
>>
hilejfat! Welcome! ~:D
<<Linguistically
important is the fact that they have limited lip movement and a more
constant airflow than humans - hence they can't make plosives or
bilabial sounds. (Is that correct? I have a goal of removing those
sounds, but I don't really know what corresponding physiological changes
would go along.)>>
A couple things with this. First of all, nasals are basically plosives
with the air flowing through the nose--so I wouldn't say they can't make
plosives. Second, there's no reason they wouldn't be able to make stops with
a spread glottis--that is, aspirated stops. That way air can still flow and
there can still be a stop. Third, to make a click, you have to have two
complete closures: One at the velum, and another at the point of articulation
ahead of that which is where the click's point of articulation is said to be
(for instance, to make a post alveolar click, you close off the back portion
of the oral cavity by raising your tongue dorsum to the velum and then trap
the air inside by closing off a portion in front of the velum--in this case,
at the alveolar ridge. When the air that's trapped inside that space is
released, a click is produced). So, I can't see them being able to produce a
click... Well, unless there was air flowing out of the nose. Is that what a
nasalized click is?
Anyway, I look forward to hearing more. :)
-David
"s&m raSalo SirejsatIm, spAjs Zi v&TIl dZaGagzaZA."
"If it keeps on rainin', the levee's going to break."
--Led Zeppelin
Reply