Re: Introducing Paul Burgess and his radioactive imagination!
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Saturday, March 8, 2003, 16:57 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <cowan@...>
> Sally Caves scripsit:
> > (Yry ma kare na ykshavend onid veramo miprem; rin ywem uab onid deyrem
benda
> > na, ty imo rem onid ydrin vera.)
> >
> > "But for me it seems worse one's never starting; one's keeping at
something
> > is good, even if one doesn't win."
>
> mi zo'u na go'i .i mi jinvi le du'u le djuno be le du'u ca ka'u nunsisti
bei
> cu mutce vajni
>
> "As for me, it is not the case. I opine the proposition that the
knowledge
> of the time to stop is very important."
Ma Van Gogh, ty lo~ fandary uarel lo covkraika? Cel lo~ lorraita uarel lo
veramo ydrin, send uon rittadbak, IIRC, uarel lo verimo fasty. Ma wydaht,
loly covkrairem lo dey, hse o ifimaht. Linda hdar ai? Ydrinrem, kwa hsan
ta twisselnaht hdar ai? Tittalt deyrem ainna pa isselna. Send deyrem uo
deyrem uo deyrem.
But Van Gogh, what if he had quit his art? In his lifetime he'd never won,
and IIRC he never even sold one painting. Actually, he DID quit, most
horribly. Was that wise? Winning, why is it so important? Maybe it's the
doing that's important. And the doing and the doing and the doing.