li [Yahya Abdal-Aziz] mi tulis la
> In your conlangs, what kinds of logical connectives have you
> implemented?
> Examples would be:
In SASXSEK:
> 1. A and B - AND
A ka B
> 2. A or B or both (A and B) - the "inclusive or", OR
A kapa B
> 3. A or B but not both (A and B) - the "exclusive or", XOR
A pa B
> 4. If A, then B - "A implies B"
wa A fa B
> 5. A only if B - "A is implied by B"
B wa A \ wa B fa A
> 6. A if and only if B - "A and B imply each other", "A and
> B are equivalent"
wa A ka B
> 7. not A - ie the statement A is not true - cf Malay "tidak"
> for logical negation, below
ni A
> 8. M is not a N - ie the thing M is not one of the things N -
> cf Malay "bukan" for categorical negation, below
M ni N \ M Nin
> 9. neither A nor B - ie not A and not B
na A na B
Gloss
-----
ka = and
pa = or (exclusive)
kapa = or (ka+pa, inclusive)
wa = if
fa = then; therefore
na = but
ni = not (adv.)
-in = in-; un-; not ~
Also note that -A words are conjunctions. Most have related prepositions with
somewhat related meanings (ending with -U).
ku = with
pu = against
nu = without
fu = toward
------------------------------
dejnx nxtxr / Dana Nutter
LI SASXSEK LATIS.
http://www.nutter.net/sasxsek