Re: Anthroponymy (was Re: Re: Laadan)
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Friday, December 13, 2002, 20:44 |
--- Christophe Grandsire skrzypszy:
> The law which equalised this use came into being because of one couple! That
> couple desperately wanted the woman's family name not to disappear. She was
> the only heir of the family and the last one to wear her family name. The
> law was adopted extremely fast because the name was a national pride. It
> happens when you are called Irène Curie!!! ;))) Result: her husband,
> Frédéric Joliot and she *both* took the name Joliot-Curie.
National pride? Always thought that Marie Curie was Polish :)))
Wouldn't it have been easier for Irene and Freddy if she would have kept her
own name and he would have kept his, and the children would be named after
their mother? I mean, changing the law is quite a thing to do.
BTW The same system exists here in NL: everybody can either keep his/her own
name or adopt his/her partner's name. I think that is a good thing. Although in
practice I don't think many men take their wife's family name. Actually, I know
only one such case, in which the husband had a really horrible last name and
replaced it with his wife's (IMO equally horrible) name.
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Reply