Re: Numbers ancient & modern (was: Unilang report)
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 28, 2001, 12:11 |
En réponse à Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>:
>
> Quite right.
>
> Inscriptions on tombstones show forms like IIXX = eighteen; IXXX = 29,
> reflecting what was actually said.
>
> That's too messy for us moderns, so we've come with things like IV and
> IX,
> which the Romans wrote as IIII and VIIII and extended that system.
>
Well, I prefer the system as it was done by the Romans :) . From now on I will
use it (after all, I even pronounce latin setphrases with the Reconstructed
Latin Pronunciation I was taught at school :) ).
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr