Re: Angloclony (was: Re: clothing terms)

On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, David Peterson wrote:

> In a message dated 6/9/01 8:48:32 AM, alrivera@SOUTHERN.EDU writes:
>
> <<  >Zhul (ZHOOL)
>     >Ramgur (rahm-GOOR)
>
> ... which doesn't tell me whether "oo" is supposed to be /u/ in the first
> and /U/ in the second (as the angloclony might lead to expect: <fool>,
> <poor>), or only one of those vowels in both cases (as I expect is meant?).
Maybe it's /o:/.

There's a reason to learn the IPA...